Improving the learning outcomes of physical education students through the application of the read, answer, discuss, and create (RADEC) learning model
Main Article Content
Abstract
Learning outcomes are a necessity that needs to be achieved optimally in every lesson. However, not all students can realize their desire to obtain optimal learning outcomes. Therefore, through writing this article it aims to analyze the increase in student learning outcomes in physical education philosophy lectures through the application of the RADEC learning model. The chosen research method is classroom action research. As many as 30 students were involved in this study as research subjects. Data was collected using techniques and instruments in the form of observation, written tests, and interviews. Data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results of the study revealed that student learning outcomes in cycle 1 had an average value of 67.53; and classical completeness of 60%. The results of the study in cycle 2 increased the mean score to 73.73 and classical completeness to 96.67%. From the results of the study, it was concluded that the application of the RADEC learning model was proven to be able to improve physical education student learning outcomes in physical education philosophy lectures. It is recommended that lecturers implement this learning model in different subjects.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmed, J., Shah, K., & Shenoy, N. (2013). How different are students and their learning styles. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 1(3), 212-215. DOI: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20130808
Balasubramaniam, S. M., Bhargava, S., Agrawal, N., Asif, R., Chawngthu, L., Sinha, P., ... & Sood, B. (2018). Blending virtual with conventional learning to improve student midwifery skills in India. Nurse education in practice, 28, 163-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.028
Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best‐evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.50
Damaianti, V. S., Abidin, Y., & Rahma, R. (2020). Higher order thinking skills-based reading literacy assessment instrument: An Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 513-525. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28600
Evita, E., Syahid, A., & Nurdin, N. (2019). Understanding Students’ Learning Outcomes Differences Through the Application of the Market Place Activity Type of Cooperative Learning Model and the Application of Conventional Learning Models. International Journal of Contemporary Islamic Education, 1(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.24239/ijcied.Vol1.Iss1.5
Hidajat, H. G., Hanurawan, F., Chusniyah, T., & Rahmawati, H. (2020). Why I’m Bored in Learning? Exploration of Students’ Academic Motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1339a
Kadosh, K. C., & Staunton, G. (2019). A systematic review of the psychological factors that influence neurofeedback learning outcomes. Neuroimage, 185, 545-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.021
Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z., Jain, L. C., Klašnja-Milićević, A., ... & Jain, L. C. (2017). Personalization and adaptation in e-learning systems. E-Learning Systems: Intelligent Techniques for Personalization, 21-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41163-7_2
Kurniawati, I. D., & Nita, S.-. (2018). Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Multimedia Interaktif Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa. DoubleClick: Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 1(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.25273/doubleclick.v1i2.1540
Lena, M. S., Trisno, E., & Khairat, F. (2022). The Effect of Motivation and Interest on Students' English Learning Outcomes. Mextesol Journal, 46(3), 1-13.
Lin, J. W., Yen, M. H., Liang, J., Chiu, M. H., & Guo, C. J. (2016). Examining the factors that influence students’ science learning processes and their learning outcomes: 30 years of conceptual change research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2617-2646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a
Logan, R. M., Johnson, C. E., & Worsham, J. W. (2021). Development of an e-learning module to facilitate student learning and outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(2), 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.10.007
Magdalena, S. M. (2015). The relationship of learning styles, learning behaviour and learning outcomes at the romanian students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1667-1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.062
Muhlisin, A. (2019). Reading, mind mapping, and sharing (rms): innovation of new learning model on science lecture to improve understanding concepts. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.570501
Nopiyanto, Y. E., & Raibowo, S. (2020). Penerapan model pembelajaran Jigsaw untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar mahasiswa penjas pada mata kuliah filsafat penjas dan olahraga. Journal Of Sport Education (JOPE), 2(2), 61-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jope.2.2.61-69
Senen, A., Sari, Y. P., Herwin, H., Rasimin, R., & Dahalan, S. C. (2021). The Use of Photo Comics Media: Changing Reading Interest and Learning Outcomes in Elementary Social Studies Subjects. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(5), 2300-2312. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i5.6337
Setiawan, D., Sopandi, W., & Hartati, T. (2020, March). The influence of read, answer, disscuss, explain, and create (RADEC) learning model on the concept mastery of elementary school students on the water cycle topic. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1521, No. 4, p. 042113). IOP Publishing. 10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042113
Sopandi, W. (2017, September). The quality improvement of learning processes and achievements through the read-answer-discuss-explain-and create learning model implementation. In Proceeding 8th Pedagogy International Seminar (Vol. 8, pp. 132-139).
Sopandi, W., & Handayani, H. (2019, January). The Impact of Workshop on Implementation of Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain-And-Create (RADEC) Learning Model on Pedagogic Competency of Elementary School Teachers. In 1st International Conference on Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2018) (pp. 7-11). Atlantis Press.
Sukmawati, D., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2020, March). The application of read-answer-discuss-explain-and create (radec) models to improve student learning outcomes in class v elementary school on human respiratory system. In International Conference on Elementary Education (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1734-1742).
Sulman, F., Taqwa, M. R. A., Zb, A., Rafzan, R., & Fikri, A. (2020). The Effect of Mathematical Connections on the Mastery of Probability Material. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.645
Susilo, H., Chotimah, H., & Sari, Y. D. (2022). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).
Tzenios, N. (2020). Clustering Students for Personalized Health Education Based on Learning Styles. Sage Science Review of Educational Technology, 3(1), 22-36. Retrieved from https://journals.sagescience.org/index.php/ssret/article/view/22
Zulfikar, T., Dahliana, S., & Sari, R. A. (2019). An Exploration of English Students' Attitude towards English Learning. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1), 1-12.
Zurweni, Z., Wibawa, B., & Erwin, T. N. (2017, August). Development of collaborative-creative learning model using virtual laboratory media for instrumental analytical chemistry lectures. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1868, No. 1). AIP Publishing.